Shirmon v. State
This text of 362 So. 2d 478 (Shirmon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was convicted for the offenses of burglary and attempted grand larceny. The convictions are affirmed. However, the judgment and sentence form, although adjudicating appellant guilty of each offense, fails to reflect a pronouncement of sentence for the offense of attempted grand larceny. This is improper. Helton v. State, 106 So.2d 79 (Fla.1958); Bateh v. State, 101 So.2d 869 (Fla. 1st D.C.A. 1958), cert. disch. 110 So.2d 7 (Fla.1959); Slay v. State, 347 So.2d 730 (Fla. 1st D.C.A. 1977). Accordingly, the judgment and sentence are reversed and the cause remanded for the imposition of a proper sentence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
362 So. 2d 478, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 17237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shirmon-v-state-fladistctapp-1978.