Shirmon v. State

362 So. 2d 478, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 17237
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 21, 1978
DocketNo. HH-228
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 362 So. 2d 478 (Shirmon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shirmon v. State, 362 So. 2d 478, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 17237 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted for the offenses of burglary and attempted grand larceny. The convictions are affirmed. However, the judgment and sentence form, although adjudicating appellant guilty of each offense, fails to reflect a pronouncement of sentence for the offense of attempted grand larceny. This is improper. Helton v. State, 106 So.2d 79 (Fla.1958); Bateh v. State, 101 So.2d 869 (Fla. 1st D.C.A. 1958), cert. disch. 110 So.2d 7 (Fla.1959); Slay v. State, 347 So.2d 730 (Fla. 1st D.C.A. 1977). Accordingly, the judgment and sentence are reversed and the cause remanded for the imposition of a proper sentence.

McCORD, C. J., and MILLS and BOYER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Manucy v. Manucy
362 So. 2d 478 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
362 So. 2d 478, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 17237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shirmon-v-state-fladistctapp-1978.