Shirley v. Triplett
This text of 21 F. Cas. 1328 (Shirley v. Triplett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of West Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
upon mature deliberation refused to give to the jury any of the instructions asked for by the counsel for the defendants. and gave to the jury the instructions asked for by the plaintiff’s counsel, and the case being submitted to the jury on the evidence and instructions, they found a verdict for the plaintiff for the amount claimed against all of the defendants but Yerkey. The counsel for defendant Triplett then asked for a new trial, on the ground that the verdict of the jury was contrary to law and evidence, but the court overruled the motion, and entered judgment on the verdict.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 F. Cas. 1328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shirley-v-triplett-circtdwv-1865.