Shirley v. State

785 S.E.2d 24, 336 Ga. App. 315, 2016 Ga. App. LEXIS 171
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 22, 2016
DocketA14A0979
StatusPublished

This text of 785 S.E.2d 24 (Shirley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shirley v. State, 785 S.E.2d 24, 336 Ga. App. 315, 2016 Ga. App. LEXIS 171 (Ga. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Ray, Judge.

In Shirley v. State, 330 Ga. App. 424 (765 SE2d 491) (2014), this Court affirmed the trial court’s order denying Michael Scott Shirley’s motion to suppress evidence related to images of child pornography seized from his home, finding that the application for a search warrant was supported by probable cause. In Shirley v. State, 297 Ga. 722 (777 SE2d 444) (2015), the Supreme Court reversed, determining [316]*316that the warrant application was insufficient to support probable cause and that Shirley’s motion to suppress should have been granted. Accordingly, we vacate our earlier opinion, adopt the Supreme Court’s opinion as our own, and reverse the judgment of the trial court.

Decided March 22, 2016. Crawford & Boyle, Eric C. Crawford, for appellant. Daniel J. Porter, District Attorney, Richard C. Armond, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Judgment reversed.

Andrews, P. J., and McFadden, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shirley v. State
777 S.E.2d 444 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2015)
Shirley v. State
765 S.E.2d 491 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
785 S.E.2d 24, 336 Ga. App. 315, 2016 Ga. App. LEXIS 171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shirley-v-state-gactapp-2016.