Shirley v. State

785 S.E.2d 24, 336 Ga. App. 315, 2016 Ga. App. LEXIS 171
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Shirley v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 330 Ga. App. 424
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 22, 2016·No. A14A0979·Published

Opinion

Ray, Judge.

In Shirley v. State, 330 Ga. App. 424 (765 SE2d 491) (2014), this Court affirmed the trial court’s order denying Michael Scott Shirley’s motion to suppress evidence related to images of child pornography seized from his home, finding that the application for a search warrant was supported by probable cause. In Shirley v. State, 297 Ga. 722 (777 SE2d 444) (2015), the Supreme Court reversed, determining [316] that the warrant application was insufficient to support probable cause and that Shirley’s motion to suppress should have been granted. Accordingly, we vacate our earlier opinion, adopt the Supreme Court’s opinion as our own, and reverse the judgment of the trial court.

Decided March 22, 2016. Crawford & Boyle, Eric C. Crawford, for appellant. Daniel J. Porter, District Attorney, Richard C. Armond, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Judgment reversed.

Andrews, P. J., and McFadden, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shirley v. State, 785 S.E.2d 24, 336 Ga. App. 315, 2016 Ga. App. LEXIS 171 (Ga. Ct. App. 2016).

785 S.E.2d 24 (Shirley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shirley v. State
777 S.E.2d 444 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2015)
Shirley v. State
765 S.E.2d 491 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2014)