Shirley v. State

832 So. 2d 966, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 19230, 2002 WL 31875005
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 27, 2002·No. No. 2D01-3144·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

COVINGTON, Judge.

John Shirley appeals the sentences that were imposed after this court remanded his case for resentencing. See Shirley v. State, 775 So.2d 366 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). Shirley contends that the trial court improperly resentenced him using the 1995 sentencing guidelines even though the offenses occurred or began during the window period set forth in Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000), and Trapp v. State, 760 So.2d 924 (Fla.2000). The State properly confesses error. Shirley’s sentences are therefore reversed, and this cause is remanded for resentencing under the guidelines that were valid on the dates of Shirley’s offenses. See Trapp, 760 So.2d at 928.

Reversed and remanded.

BLUE, C.J, and DAVIS, J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shirley v. State, 832 So. 2d 966, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 19230, 2002 WL 31875005 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

832 So. 2d 966 (Shirley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tindle v. State
832 So. 2d 966 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)