Shirley v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Shirley v. State

51 So. 2d 702, 35 Ala. App. 639, 1951 Ala. App. LEXIS 537

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 3, 1951

Docket2 Div. 810

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 51 So. 2d 702 (Shirley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shirley v. State, 51 So. 2d 702, 35 Ala. App. 639, 1951 Ala. App. LEXIS 537 (Ala. Ct. App. 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

CARR, Presiding Judge.

The accused was indicted on a single count charging larceny. After trial and conviction, his motion for a new trial was granted.

At a subsequent time the defendant was reindicted for larceny of the same property and to the latter indictment were added counts charging buying, receiving, concealing or aiding in concealing the property.

To the second indictment defendant entered a plea of former jeopardy. This was not sustained and then the accused pleaded guilty to buying, etc., the property in question.

The only matter of critical concern on this appeal is whether a conviction on a charge of larceny alone is a bar to a subsequent prosecution for buying, receiving, concealing or aiding in the concealment of the identical property which forms the basis of the larceny charge in the first indictment.

The authorities are committed to the view that it is not. Foster v. State, 39 Ala. 229.

A plea of former jeopardy is unavailable unless the offense presently charged is the same in law and fact as the former one. Holcomb v. State, 19 Ala.App. 24, 94 So. 917; Blevins v. State, 20 Ala.App. 229, 101 So. 478; Johns v. State, 13 Ala.App. 283, 69 So. 259.

The judgment below is ordered affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI