Shirley v. South Carolina Department of Corrections

Fourth Circuit

Shirley v. South Carolina Department of Corrections

119 F. App'x 546

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 20, 2005·No. No. 04-7535·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Stephen Shirley appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Shirley v. Langston, No. 03-1630-22BD (D.S.C., filed Aug. 25, 2004 & entered Aug. 26, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Stephen Shirley appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Shirley v. Langston, No. 03-1630-22BD (D.S.C., filed Aug. 25, 2004 & entered Aug. 26, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Shirley v. South Carolina Department of Corrections, 119 F. App'x 546 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

119 F. App'x 546 (Shirley v. South Carolina Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related