Shirley v. Republic-Franklin Ins.

Ohio Supreme Court

Shirley v. Republic-Franklin Ins.

801 N.E.2d 850, 101 Ohio St. 3d 1413

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 13, 2004

Docket2003-1612

StatusPublished

This text of 801 N.E.2d 850 (Shirley v. Republic-Franklin Ins.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shirley v. Republic-Franklin Ins., 801 N.E.2d 850, 101 Ohio St. 3d 1413 (Ohio 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Stark App. No. 2002CA00247, 2003-Ohio-4039. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. On September 10, 2003, appellant filed a notice that a motion to certify a conflict was pending in the court of appeals, and pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(A), this court stayed consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in this appeal. Whereas appellant has neither notified this court that the court of appeals determined that a conflict does not exist as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(B), nor filed a copy of the court of appeals’ order certifying the existence of a conflict as provided by S.Ct.Prae.R. IV(4)(C),

[1414]*1414IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellant show cause within 10 days of the date of this entry why this court should not proceed to consider the jurisdictional memoranda in this appeal pursuant to S.Ct.Prae.R. 111(6).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stark App. No. 2002CA00247, 2003-Ohio-4039. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. On September 10, 2003, appellant filed a notice that a motion to certify a conflict was pending in the court of appeals, and pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(A), this court stayed consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in this appeal. Whereas appellant has neither notified this court that the court of appeals determined that a conflict does not exist as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(B), nor filed a copy of the court of appeals’ order certifying the existence of a conflict as provided by S.Ct.Prae.R. IV(4)(C),

[1414]*1414IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellant show cause within 10 days of the date of this entry why this court should not proceed to consider the jurisdictional memoranda in this appeal pursuant to S.Ct.Prae.R. 111(6).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

801 N.E.2d 850, 101 Ohio St. 3d 1413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shirley-v-republic-franklin-ins-ohio-2004.