Shirley v. Hicks

31 S.E. 105, 105 Ga. 504, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 635
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 19, 1898·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

XjIttle, J.

1. When a certified copy of a deed is tendered in evidence,, and a showing is made from which it may reasonably be inferred’ that the original is in the custody of a person beyond the limits of this State, who is not a party to the pending case, the foundation for' the introduction of the secondary evidence is well laid.

32. A sworn answer to a petition for injunction may, at an interlocutory-hearing, be considered by the judge as' evidence, though offered as-[505]*505such without tendering therewith the plaintiff’s petition, and though not offered at all until after the evidence in the case had been formally closed.

Submitted June 15, Decided July 19, 1898. Petition for injunction. Before Judge Kimsey. Haber-sham county. March 8, 1898. J. O. Edwards and O. L. Bass, for plaintiff. George P. Erwin, for defendants.

3. Even if any error was committed in admitting testimony in the defendant’s behalf, the evidence as to the admissibility of which there could he no doubt warranted the judgment denying the injunction.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shirley v. Hicks, 31 S.E. 105, 105 Ga. 504, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 635 (Ga. 1898).

31 S.E. 105 (Shirley v. Hicks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Silvey v. Wynn
115 S.E.2d 774 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1960)
Warner v. Martin
52 S.E. 446 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)