Shirley v. Commonwealth

293 S.W.2d 636
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedSeptember 14, 1956
StatusPublished

This text of 293 S.W.2d 636 (Shirley v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shirley v. Commonwealth, 293 S.W.2d 636 (Ky. Ct. App. 1956).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Betty Lou Shirley, was convicted in the Oldham Circuit Court of the offense of keeping alcoholic beverages for the purpose of sale in dry territory in violation of KRS 242.230(1), and her punishment was fixed by the jury at $50 fine and thirty days in jail. She has moved this court to grant her an appeal and urges reversal upon the sole ground that the search of the premises of her restaurant was illegal and the evidence obtained by the search inadmissible because the search warrant was issued upon an insufficient affidavit.

We have examined the affidavit and find it sufficient under the authority of the following cases: Commonwealth v. Thomas, 225 Ky. 603, 9 S.W.2d 719; Commonwealth v. Elliott, 305 Ky. 554, 204 S.W.2d 948.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Thomas
9 S.W.2d 719 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1928)
Commonwealth v. Elliott
204 S.W.2d 948 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
293 S.W.2d 636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shirley-v-commonwealth-kyctapp-1956.