Shirley v. Barnhart
This text of 137 F. App'x 978 (Shirley v. Barnhart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Debra Shirley appeals the district court’s order upholding the Social Security Commissioner’s denial of disability benefits. A claimant for Social Security disability benefits bears the burden of proving disability. Meanel v. Apfel, 172 F.3d 1111, 1113 (9th Cir.1999). In this case, Shirley submitted records from multiple doctors. None of the doctors found her to be permanently disabled. No medical evidence supports her claim of “severe mental impairment.” The lack of any medical finding of disability is fatal to Shirley’s claim.1 The other evidence in the record, including Shirley’s own testimony, is not sufficient to prove a claim of disability. The district court’s order is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
137 F. App'x 978, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shirley-v-barnhart-ca9-2005.