Shirley Realty Co. v. City of East Orange

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Shirley Realty Co. v. City of East Orange

135 A. 925, 4 N.J. Misc. 1007, 1926 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 38

DecidedNovember 24, 1926

StatusPublished

This text of 135 A. 925 (Shirley Realty Co. v. City of East Orange) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shirley Realty Co. v. City of East Orange, 135 A. 925, 4 N.J. Misc. 1007, 1926 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 38 (N.J. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The record presents the usual circumstances attending an application for a permit to build, which was refused under the provisions of the usual zoning ordinances, in East Orange. The case is res judicata under the opinion of this court, affirmed in the Court of Errors and Appeals, in the so-called Nutley case. State v. Nutley, 99 N. J. L. 389.

The peremptory writ of mmdamus will therefore be awarded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam.

The record presents the usual circumstances attending an application for a permit to build, which was refused under the provisions of the usual zoning ordinances, in East Orange. The case is res judicata under the opinion of this court, affirmed in the Court of Errors and Appeals, in the so-called Nutley case. State v. Nutley, 99 N. J. L. 389.

The peremptory writ of mmdamus will therefore be awarded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

135 A. 925, 4 N.J. Misc. 1007, 1926 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shirley-realty-co-v-city-of-east-orange-nj-1926.