Shirley M. C. v. Curley G.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Shirley M. C. v. Curley G.

188 A.D.2d 1080, 592 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14973

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 30, 1992

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 188 A.D.2d 1080 (Shirley M. C. v. Curley G.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shirley M. C. v. Curley G., 188 A.D.2d 1080, 592 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14973 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Mem-

orandum: In June 1986, respondent was adjudged to be the father of petitioner’s infant daughter, and, in July 1986, he was ordered to pay child support. Respondent filed a notice of appeal but his appeal was abandoned when he failed to perfect it.

In May 1991, petitioner sought an increase in child support. Respondent cross-petitioned to vacate the order of filiation and to reopen the paternity proceeding so that a blood grouping test could be conducted. Family Court properly denied respondent’s cross petition. (Appeal from Order of Monroe County Family Court, Sciolino, J. — Paternity.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Green, Boehm and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Mem-

orandum: In June 1986, respondent was adjudged to be the father of petitioner’s infant daughter, and, in July 1986, he was ordered to pay child support. Respondent filed a notice of appeal but his appeal was abandoned when he failed to perfect it.

In May 1991, petitioner sought an increase in child support. Respondent cross-petitioned to vacate the order of filiation and to reopen the paternity proceeding so that a blood grouping test could be conducted. Family Court properly denied respondent’s cross petition. (Appeal from Order of Monroe County Family Court, Sciolino, J. — Paternity.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Green, Boehm and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

188 A.D.2d 1080, 592 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14973, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shirley-m-c-v-curley-g-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack