Shirley Lenoir, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Shana Lenoir and Christopher McKnight , Individually and as Next Friend of Nayla McKnight v. U.T. Physicians

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 23, 2016·No. 01-14-00767-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR EN BANC RECONSIDERATION

Appellate case name: Shirley Lenoir, Individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Shana Lenoir and Christopher McKnight , Individually and as next friend of Nayla McKnight v. U.T. Physicians

Appellate case number: 01-14-00767-CV

Trial court case number: 2012-35806

Trial court: 164th District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: May 17, 2016

Party filing motion: U.T. Physicians

It is ordered that the motion for en banc reconsideration is DENIED GRANTED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown Acting Individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings, Keyes, Higley, Massengale, Brown, Huddle, and Lloyd.

Justice Bland, not sitting.

Date: June 23, 2016

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shirley Lenoir, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Shana Lenoir and Christopher McKnight , Individually and as Next Friend of Nayla McKnight v. U.T. Physicians, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Shirley Lenoir, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Shana Lenoir and Christopher McKnight , Individually and as Next Friend of Nayla McKnight v. U.T. Physicians (Shirley Lenoir, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Shana Lenoir and Christopher McKnight , Individually and as Next Friend of Nayla McKnight v. U.T. Physicians) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.