Shirley Ann Holland v. The Central National Insurance Company of Omaha

Fifth Circuit

Shirley Ann Holland v. The Central National Insurance Company of Omaha

355 F.2d 545, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 7340

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 31, 1966

Docket22860_1

StatusPublished

This text of 355 F.2d 545 (Shirley Ann Holland v. The Central National Insurance Company of Omaha) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shirley Ann Holland v. The Central National Insurance Company of Omaha, 355 F.2d 545, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 7340 (5th Cir. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court dismissing without prejudice the cross claims of the appellants.

The Central National Insurance Company of Omaha, appellee, filed in the United States District Court an action for declaratory judgment involving a policy of automobile liability insurance to determine whether it was under a duty to defend certain suits brought in the Georgia state court based on negligence involving the insured automobile.

The plaintiffs in the state court cases were joined by the appellee as defendants in the declaratory judgment case below. *546 These defendants filed cross claims involving the same cause of action as the state court cases.

A review of the record reveals no error in the District Court’s judgment dismissing the cross claims without prejudice. It follows that the judgment should be, and it is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court dismissing without prejudice the cross claims of the appellants.

The Central National Insurance Company of Omaha, appellee, filed in the United States District Court an action for declaratory judgment involving a policy of automobile liability insurance to determine whether it was under a duty to defend certain suits brought in the Georgia state court based on negligence involving the insured automobile.

The plaintiffs in the state court cases were joined by the appellee as defendants in the declaratory judgment case below. *546 These defendants filed cross claims involving the same cause of action as the state court cases.

A review of the record reveals no error in the District Court’s judgment dismissing the cross claims without prejudice. It follows that the judgment should be, and it is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

355 F.2d 545, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 7340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shirley-ann-holland-v-the-central-national-insurance-company-of-omaha-ca5-1966.