Shirley Ann Daigle Guilbeau v. Southern Pacific Company

Fifth Circuit

Shirley Ann Daigle Guilbeau v. Southern Pacific Company

427 F.2d 1366, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 8201

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedJuly 13, 1970

Docket28720_1

StatusPublished

This text of 427 F.2d 1366 (Shirley Ann Daigle Guilbeau v. Southern Pacific Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shirley Ann Daigle Guilbeau v. Southern Pacific Company, 427 F.2d 1366, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 8201 (5th Cir. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This diversity case originated as a personal injury action arising out of a collision between a train and an automobile. John Leroy Guilbeau and his daughter, Sonyia Marie Guilbeau, were killed when the car which Mr. Guilbeau was driving collided with a Southern Pacific train in St. Martin Parish, Louisiana. The wife and son of Mr. Guilbeau brought actions for damages against the railroad. The cause was tried to a jury. The jury found in favor of the plaintiffs, and judgment was entered for the plaintiffs on the basis of the jury verdict. The railroad appeals.

In its brief and oral argument appellant has advanced numerous assignments of error. We have carefully examined each of appellant’s contentions in the light of the record to determine whether any error was committed that would require a reversal of the judgment. Having found no error, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This diversity case originated as a personal injury action arising out of a collision between a train and an automobile. John Leroy Guilbeau and his daughter, Sonyia Marie Guilbeau, were killed when the car which Mr. Guilbeau was driving collided with a Southern Pacific train in St. Martin Parish, Louisiana. The wife and son of Mr. Guilbeau brought actions for damages against the railroad. The cause was tried to a jury. The jury found in favor of the plaintiffs, and judgment was entered for the plaintiffs on the basis of the jury verdict. The railroad appeals.

In its brief and oral argument appellant has advanced numerous assignments of error. We have carefully examined each of appellant’s contentions in the light of the record to determine whether any error was committed that would require a reversal of the judgment. Having found no error, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

427 F.2d 1366, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 8201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shirley-ann-daigle-guilbeau-v-southern-pacific-company-ca5-1970.