Shirley Adams, Charlene Burgess, Willie Mae Herbst Jasik, William Albert Herbst, Helen Herbst and R. May Oil & Gas Company, Ltd. v. Murphy Exploration & Production Co.-USA, a Delaware Corporation

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Shirley Adams, Charlene Burgess, Willie Mae Herbst Jasik, William Albert Herbst, Helen Herbst and R. May Oil & Gas Company, Ltd. v. Murphy Exploration & Production Co.-USA, a Delaware Corporation. Read the opinion of the Court — 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 6276
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 5, 2015·No. 04-15-00118-CV·Published

Opinion

ACCEPTED 04-15-00118-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 5/5/2015 11:48:57 AM KEITH HOTTLE CLERK

NO. 04-15-00118-CV _____________________________________________________________________________ IN THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS FILED IN AT SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 5/5/2015 11:48:57 AM SHIRLEY ADAMS, CHARLENE BURGESS, WILLIE MAE HERBST KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk JASIK, WILLIAM ALBERT HERBST, HELEN HERBST AND R. MAY OIL & GAS COMPANY, LTD., Appellants V.

MURPHY EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION CO. - USA, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, Appellee __________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 218TH District Court of Atascosa County, Texas Honorable Stella Saxon, Presiding ________________________________________________________________

APPELLANTS' SECOND UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANTS' BRIEF ________________________________________________________________

TO THE HONORABLE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS:

1. Appellants Shirley Adams, Charlene Burgess, Willie Mae Herbst

Jasik, William Albert Herbst, Helen Herbst and R. May Oil & Gas Company, Ltd.

request an extension of time to file Appellants' Brief. Appellants' Brief is currently

due on Wednesday, May 13, 2015. Appellants seek an extension to 30 days after a

complete Clerk’s Record is filed. 2. CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE: Counsel for Appellants has

conferred with Macey Stokes, Lead Counsel for Appellee, who has represented

that Appellee does not oppose this motion.

3. Appellants’ Brief is currently due on May 13, 2015. Counsel

responsible for drafting and filing Appellants' Brief began work on the record cites

for the brief this week and learned, for the first time, that the Clerk’s Record

omitted numerous attachments to the petition, the motions for partial summary

judgment and responses thereto filed by both Appellants and Appellee. In other

words, the body of these filings were included in the Clerk’s Record but their

attachments were not.

4. Appellants have conferred with the deputy district clerk responsible

for preparing the record and, pursuant to her instructions, have sent her and

Margaret Littleton, the district clerk, a letter detailing the missing items and

requesting a corrected/supplemental record. A copy of that letter is attached as

Exhibit A.

5. This extension is necessary to provide the Court with an accurate

record of what was before the district court and to afford counsel for Appellants

adequate time to prepare the Appellants' Brief with cites to that record.

5. Appellants have previously requested one extension of time to file

Appellants' Brief in this case.

2 WHEREFORE, premises considered, Appellants Shirley Adams, Charlene

Burgess, Willie Mae Herbst Jasik, William Albert Herbst, Helen Herbst and R.

May Oil & Gas Company, Ltd. request that the Court set as the deadline for

Appellants to file Appellants' Brief in this case 30 days from the filing of the

district clerk’s corrected/supplemental record. In the alternative, Appellants

request a 30-day extension to June 13, 2015 or such other relief that the Court

considers appropriate.

Respectfully submitted,

GRAVES DOUGHERTY HEARON & MOODY, P.C.

By: /s/ Mary A. Keeney Mary A. Keeney State Bar No. 11170300 mkeeney@gdhm.com John B. McFarland State Bar No. 13598500 jmcfarland@gdhm.com 401 Congress Ave., Suite 2200 Austin, Texas 78701 Telephone: (512) 480-5682 Facsimile: (512) 480-5882 ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS SHIRLEY ADAMS, CHARLENE BURGESS, WILLIE MAE HERBST JASIK, WILLIAM ALBERT HERBST, HELEN HERBST AND R. MAY OIL & GAS COMPANY, LTD.

3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on May 5, 2015, a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served on counsel for Appellee via email and/or electronic service as shown below:

Macey Reasoner Stokes Jason A. Newman Baker Botts L.L.P. One Shell Plaza 910 Louisiana Street Houston, Texas 77002-4995 ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE MURPHY EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION COMPANY - USA Macey.stokes@bakerbotts.com Jason.newman@bakerbotts.com

/s/ Mary A. Keeney Mary A. Keeney

4 GD HM Mary A. Keeney Board Certified, Civil Appellate Law Texas Board of Legal Specialization GRAVES DOUGHERTY HEARON & MOODY A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 512.480.5682 512.480.5882 (fax) mkeeney@gdhm.com

MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 98 Austin, TX 78767-9998

May 5, 2015

Ms. Margaret E. Littleton Via Facsimile: (830) 769-1332 Atascosa County District Clerk Ms. Cris Benavidez Deputy Clerk #1 Courthouse Circle Drive Suite 4-B Jourdanton, Texas 78026

Re: Cause No. 13-05-0466-CVA; Shirley Adams, et al v. Murphy Exploration & Production Co. - USA, a Delaware Corporation; In the 218th Judicial District of Atascosa County, Texas

Fourth Court of Appeals Case No. 04-15-00118-CV

Dear Ms. Littleton and Ms. Benavidez:

Pursuant to my telephone conversation with deputy clerk Cris Benavidez and her instructions, I am providing a list of the documents missing from the Clerk's Record in the above-described and numbered cause. Ms. Benavidez further instructed that this communication be provided to the fax number provided above. I am also providing a copy of the letter of February 24, 2015, I sent to your office designating the matters to be included in the record. The numbering provided below coincides with the numbers of the items designated in that February 24 letter. The main documents missing are attachments to the petition and to motions and responses to motions. The main body of the petition and the motions and responses themselves were included in the clerk's record but the attachments were omitted. The attachments, however, are part of the petition, the motions and the responses and should have been made a part of the record. In addition, in one instance some but not all of the attachments were included — three pages were missing. The court of appeals cannot properly review this case under the current state of the clerk's record because it does not accurately reflect what was before the district court.

EXHIBIT 1

401 Congress Avenue Suite 2200 Austin, Texas 78701 512.480.5600 www.gdhm.com May 5, 2015 Page 2

This letter is a request for a corrected/supplemental record that would include the pleadings, motions, and responses with all of their attachments. In order to facilitate the court of appeals' review of the record, I am requesting that you redo the record in its entirety. In other words, the documents in the original clerk's record should be included in the order you prepared them before but should now include all of these missing attachments. This will require a renumbering of the record. In addition, please add to the record my original letter of February 24, 2015 designating the record as well as this letter so that there will be no confusion about what has been and is now being requested. Please notify this office of the cost of preparing this 'corrected/supplemental record, and we will forward a check to you in payment of that amount. I request that your office credit my clients with the $217 we paid on their behalf for the original record.

1. The main body of the Plaintiffs' Original Petition was included. Missing from the petition are the following exhibits, which were attached to and filed with the petition:

Exhibit A - Shirley Adams Oil, Gas & Mineral Lease Exhibit B - William Herbst Oil, Gas & Mineral Lease Exhibit C - Plat of lease and unit boundaries

3. The main body of the Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment was included.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shirley Adams, Charlene Burgess, Willie Mae Herbst Jasik, William Albert Herbst, Helen Herbst and R. May Oil & Gas Company, Ltd. v. Murphy Exploration & Production Co.-USA, a Delaware Corporation, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Shirley Adams, Charlene Burgess, Willie Mae Herbst Jasik, William Albert Herbst, Helen Herbst and R. May Oil & Gas Company, Ltd. v. Murphy Exploration & Production Co.-USA, a Delaware Corporation (Shirley Adams, Charlene Burgess, Willie Mae Herbst Jasik, William Albert Herbst, Helen Herbst and R. May Oil & Gas Company, Ltd. v. Murphy Exploration & Production Co.-USA, a Delaware Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.