Shirk v. VAN DYK

Michigan Supreme Court

Shirk v. VAN DYK

658 N.W.2d 124, 468 Mich. 870

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 25, 2003

Docket121544, COA No. 227193

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 658 N.W.2d 124 (Shirk v. VAN DYK) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shirk v. VAN DYK, 658 N.W.2d 124, 468 Mich. 870 (Mich. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

658 N.W.2d 124 (2003) 468 Mich. 870

Robert SHIRK and Mary Lee Shirk, Plaintiffs, Counter-Defendants and Appellees,
v.
Arnold VAN DYK, Defendant, Counter-Plaintiff and Appellant.

Docket No. 121544, COA No. 227193.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

March 25, 2003.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the April 26, 2002 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

WEAVER, J., dissents and states as follows:

I dissent from the denial order. I would peremptorily reverse the Court of Appeals and reinstate the order of the Barry Circuit Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

658 N.W.2d 124 (2003) 468 Mich. 870

Robert SHIRK and Mary Lee Shirk, Plaintiffs, Counter-Defendants and Appellees,
v.
Arnold VAN DYK, Defendant, Counter-Plaintiff and Appellant.

Docket No. 121544, COA No. 227193.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

March 25, 2003.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the April 26, 2002 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

WEAVER, J., dissents and states as follows:

I dissent from the denial order. I would peremptorily reverse the Court of Appeals and reinstate the order of the Barry Circuit Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

658 N.W.2d 124, 468 Mich. 870, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shirk-v-van-dyk-mich-2003.

Opinion

Robert SHIRK and Mary Lee Shirk, Plaintiffs, Counter-Defendants and Appellees, v. Arnold VAN DYK, Defendant, Counter-Plaintiff and Appellant.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Robert SHIRK and Mary Lee Shirk, Plaintiffs, Counter-Defendants and Appellees,
v.
Arnold VAN DYK, Defendant, Counter-Plaintiff and Appellant.