Shippy v. Shippy

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Shippy v. Shippy

217 A.2d 58, 153 Conn. 716

DecidedFebruary 8, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 217 A.2d 58 (Shippy v. Shippy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shippy v. Shippy, 217 A.2d 58, 153 Conn. 716 (Colo. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant has appealed from a judgment rendered on a report of a state referee recommending a divorce to the defendant’s wife. The defendant was then represented by counsel. The report stated the ultimate facts found. No finding of subordinate facts was requested. No corrections were sought in the report, and no objections to the acceptance of the report were filed. Upon the record presented to us, it is impossible to review such assignments of error as have been briefed and not abandoned.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The defendant has appealed from a judgment rendered on a report of a state referee recommending a divorce to the defendant’s wife. The defendant was then represented by counsel. The report stated the ultimate facts found. No finding of subordinate facts was requested. No corrections were sought in the report, and no objections to the acceptance of the report were filed. Upon the record presented to us, it is impossible to review such assignments of error as have been briefed and not abandoned.

There is no error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

217 A.2d 58, 153 Conn. 716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shippy-v-shippy-conn-1966.