Shipp v. State

519 So. 2d 679, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 361, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 354, 1988 WL 6595
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 27, 1988
DocketNo. BR-312
StatusPublished

This text of 519 So. 2d 679 (Shipp v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shipp v. State, 519 So. 2d 679, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 361, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 354, 1988 WL 6595 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. The offenses sought to be severed were clearly and directly connected in an episodic sense. Williams v. State, 409 So.2d 253 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982), pet. for rev. den., 417 So.2d 331 (Fla.1982). See also, Brown v. State, 468 So.2d 325 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).

BOOTH, WIGGINTON and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. State
409 So. 2d 253 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Brown v. State
468 So. 2d 325 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
519 So. 2d 679, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 361, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 354, 1988 WL 6595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shipp-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.