Shipp v. Radcliff

2 Ky. 190, 1 Sneed 190, 1802 Ky. LEXIS 68
Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided November 3, 1802·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

It is an established principle that whenever the presumption is strong that an unjust verdict has been obtained by surprise, the court, on motion, ought to grant a new trial, and, from the bill of exceptions, it is conceived by this court that such was the case in the present suit. Therefore, it is considered by the court that the judgment aforesaid be reversed and set aside; that the cause be remanded to the court from whence it came for new proceedings to be had, to commence by granting to the defendant in said court a new trial, and that the plaintiff recover of the defendant in this court his costs in this behalf expended, which is ordered to be certified to the said court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shipp v. Radcliff, 2 Ky. 190, 1 Sneed 190, 1802 Ky. LEXIS 68 (Ky. Ct. App. 1802).

2 Ky. 190 (Shipp v. Radcliff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Trowell v. Carraway
57 Tenn. 104 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1872)