Shipman v. State

1912 OK CR 472, 128 P. 1134, 8 Okla. Crim. 736, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 460
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedDecember 31, 1912
DocketNo. A-1492.
StatusPublished

This text of 1912 OK CR 472 (Shipman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shipman v. State, 1912 OK CR 472, 128 P. 1134, 8 Okla. Crim. 736, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 460 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Opinion

PURMAN, P. J.

On the 7th day of May, 1910, judgment was rendered against the appellant in the district court of Sequoyah county, wherein he was sentenced to the penitentiary for a term of one year for the -crime of robbery. Prom this judgment appellant attempted to prosecute an appeal, but the transcript of the record was not filed in this court until the 24th day of November, 1911. Under our statute an appeal in a felony case must be perfected by filing transcript of the record within six months from the time of the rendition of the judgment. As the time for filing a transcript of the record in this court had expired, this court did not acquire jurisdiction of the appeal. Said pretended appeal is therefore dismissed with directions to the district court of Sequoyah county to enforce its judgment.

ARMSTRONG and DOYLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1912 OK CR 472, 128 P. 1134, 8 Okla. Crim. 736, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shipman-v-state-oklacrimapp-1912.