Shipman v. Lord

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Shipman v. Lord

46 A. 1101, 60 N.J. Eq. 484, 15 Dickinson 484, 1900 N.J. LEXIS 210

DecidedJune 18, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 46 A. 1101 (Shipman v. Lord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shipman v. Lord, 46 A. 1101, 60 N.J. Eq. 484, 15 Dickinson 484, 1900 N.J. LEXIS 210 (N.J. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

These were cross-appeals from a decree advised by Vice-Chancellor Stevens. We think the decree right, and it is affirmed, for the reasons given by the vice-chancellor in his opinion in the court below.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Ludlow, Collins, Bogert, Hendrickson, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees — 13.

For reversal — -Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

These were cross-appeals from a decree advised by Vice-Chancellor Stevens. We think the decree right, and it is affirmed, for the reasons given by the vice-chancellor in his opinion in the court below.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Ludlow, Collins, Bogert, Hendrickson, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees — 13.

For reversal — -Hone.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

46 A. 1101, 60 N.J. Eq. 484, 15 Dickinson 484, 1900 N.J. LEXIS 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shipman-v-lord-nj-1900.