Shipman v. Lord

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Shipman v. Lord

46 A. 1101, 60 N.J. Eq. 484, 15 Dickinson 484, 1900 N.J. LEXIS 210

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 18, 1900·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

These were cross-appeals from a decree advised by Vice-Chancellor Stevens. We think the decree right, and it is affirmed, for the reasons given by the vice-chancellor in his opinion in the court below.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Ludlow, Collins, Bogert, Hendrickson, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees — 13.

For reversal — -Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

These were cross-appeals from a decree advised by Vice-Chancellor Stevens. We think the decree right, and it is affirmed, for the reasons given by the vice-chancellor in his opinion in the court below.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Ludlow, Collins, Bogert, Hendrickson, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees — 13.

For reversal — -Hone.

Shipman v. Lord, 46 A. 1101, 60 N.J. Eq. 484, 15 Dickinson 484, 1900 N.J. LEXIS 210 (N.J. 1900).

Pincite

46 A. 1101 (Shipman v. Lord) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.