Shipman v. General Transistor Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Shipman v. General Transistor Corp.

12 A.D.2d 529, 207 N.Y.S.2d 734, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6946

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 28, 1960

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 12 A.D.2d 529 (Shipman v. General Transistor Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shipman v. General Transistor Corp., 12 A.D.2d 529, 207 N.Y.S.2d 734, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6946 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover unpaid salary claimed to be due to plaintiff and to recover damages for defendant’s alleged breach of an employee stock option agreement, the parties cross-appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated February 29‘, 1960: (1) plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of said order as denies his motion for summary judgment for the relief demanded in the complaint, pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice; and (2) the defendant appeals from said order insofar as it fails to grant summary judgment to defendant upon plaintiff’s said motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, without costs. There are triable issues of fact presented which preclude the granting of summary judgment to either party. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur. [22 Misc 2d 632.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover unpaid salary claimed to be due to plaintiff and to recover damages for defendant’s alleged breach of an employee stock option agreement, the parties cross-appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated February 29‘, 1960: (1) plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of said order as denies his motion for summary judgment for the relief demanded in the complaint, pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice; and (2) the defendant appeals from said order insofar as it fails to grant summary judgment to defendant upon plaintiff’s said motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, without costs. There are triable issues of fact presented which preclude the granting of summary judgment to either party. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur. [22 Misc 2d 632.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.2d 529, 207 N.Y.S.2d 734, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6946, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shipman-v-general-transistor-corp-nyappdiv-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack