Shipley v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Shipley v. State

1911 OK CR 419, 117 P. 1134, 6 Okla. Crim. 636, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 408

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 5, 1911

DocketNo. A-997.

StatusPublished

This text of 1911 OK CR 419 (Shipley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shipley v. State, 1911 OK CR 419, 117 P. 1134, 6 Okla. Crim. 636, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 408 (Okla. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On the 29th day of August, 1910, judgment was rendered against the appellant in the county court of Love county for a violation of the prohibitory liquor law, and he was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and serve 30 days in the county jail. What purports to be the ease-made filed with the petition in error has never been certified to by the trial judge and filed in the office of the county court of Love county as to by the trial judge and filed in the office of the county court as the law directs. Neither has it been certified to in such a manner as will make it a transcript of the record. Neither is their any showing that said case-made had ever been served upon the county attorney of Love county. Said pretended case-made and transcript of the record was not filed in this court until January 18th, 1911, which was long after the time allowed by law for perfecting said appeal. Por these reasons this court has never acquired jurisdiction of this case, and the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On the 29th day of August, 1910, judgment was rendered against the appellant in the county court of Love county for a violation of the prohibitory liquor law, and he was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and serve 30 days in the county jail. What purports to be the ease-made filed with the petition in error has never been certified to by the trial judge and filed in the office of the county court of Love county as to by the trial judge and filed in the office of the county court as the law directs. Neither has it been certified to in such a manner as will make it a transcript of the record. Neither is their any showing that said case-made had ever been served upon the county attorney of Love county. Said pretended case-made and transcript of the record was not filed in this court until January 18th, 1911, which was long after the time allowed by law for perfecting said appeal. Por these reasons this court has never acquired jurisdiction of this case, and the appeal is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1911 OK CR 419, 117 P. 1134, 6 Okla. Crim. 636, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 408, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shipley-v-state-oklacrimapp-1911.