Shipley v. Schmitzer
This text of 224 A.D. 730 (Shipley v. Schmitzer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Sections 278-283 of the Civil Practice Act relate solely to.motions formerly called demurrers. (255 Fifth Avenue Corporation v. Freeman, 120 Misc. 472.) Hence, section 282 of said act does not apply to a motion to dismiss a complaint made under rule 107, subdivision 6, and service of an answer to a complaint to which such a motion has been addressed would not be deemed an abandonment of such motion. Defendant does not, therefore, require an extension of time to answer pending an appeal from the order denying such motion. Present — Dowling, P. J., Merrell, Finch, McAvoy and O ’Malley, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
224 A.D. 730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shipley-v-schmitzer-nyappdiv-1928.