Shiplet v. Vilsack
179 L. Ed. 2d 651, 131 S. Ct. 1806, 563 U.S. 901, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 2498, 79 U.S.L.W. 3552
This text of 179 L. Ed. 2d 651 (Shiplet v. Vilsack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Shiplet v. Vilsack, 179 L. Ed. 2d 651, 131 S. Ct. 1806, 563 U.S. 901, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 2498, 79 U.S.L.W. 3552 (U.S. 2011).
Opinion
Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari with the [652]*652supplemental appendix under seal denied without prejudice to filing a renewed motion together with either a redacted supplemental appendix, or an explanation as to why the supplemental appendix may not be redacted, within 30 days.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
179 L. Ed. 2d 651, 131 S. Ct. 1806, 563 U.S. 901, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 2498, 79 U.S.L.W. 3552, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shiplet-v-vilsack-scotus-2011.