Shipkovitz v. Hughes

Fourth Circuit

Shipkovitz v. Hughes

250 F. App'x 542

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 11, 2007·No. No. 06-1897·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Samuel Shipkovitz appeals a district court order granting an Appellee’s motion to dismiss and a district court order granting summary judgment to the remaining Appellees and closing the case. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See Shipkovitz v. Arlington County, No. l:05-cv-01219-CMH (E.D. Va. filed May 12, 2006, entered May 17, 2006; filed June 22, 2006, entered June 26, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Samuel Shipkovitz appeals a district court order granting an Appellee’s motion to dismiss and a district court order granting summary judgment to the remaining Appellees and closing the case. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See Shipkovitz v. Arlington County, No. l:05-cv-01219-CMH (E.D. Va. filed May 12, 2006, entered May 17, 2006; filed June 22, 2006, entered June 26, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Shipkovitz v. Hughes, 250 F. App'x 542 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

250 F. App'x 542 (Shipkovitz v. Hughes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.