Shipherd v. Cohn
This text of 23 N.Y. St. Rep. 629 (Shipherd v. Cohn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The ground asserted for a re-argument is, that the court mistook a fact. That fact was that a certain order, to which the court referred in its opinion, was dated in 1887, instead of 1888, as the court assumed. The court was not mistaken, for the existence of the fact was to be determined solely by the contents of the record then before it. By that, the affidavit of Mr. Thain declared that the order was made in 1888, and the court could not assume otherwise. If, however, the order was of the date in 1887, the result would not have been different. Other considerations would have required the order made by the general term.
Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 N.Y. St. Rep. 629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shipherd-v-cohn-nysuperctnyc-1889.