Shiomos v. Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Shiomos v. Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts

572 A.2d 1313, 132 Pa. Commw. 383, 1990 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 207

CourtCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 2, 1990

DocketNo. 251 C.D. 1989

StatusPublished

This text of 572 A.2d 1313 (Shiomos v. Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shiomos v. Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts, 572 A.2d 1313, 132 Pa. Commw. 383, 1990 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 207 (Pa. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PALLADINO, Judge.

Thomas N. Shiomos (Shiomos) appeals from an order of the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts (AOPC) which terminated Shiomos’ medical insurance coverage as of January 5, 1989. Shiomos did not argue the merits of this case, admitting that this case is controlled by our opinions in Shiomos v. State Employes’ Retirement Board, 128 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 39, 562 A.2d 969 (1989) petition for allowance of appeal granted, 524 Pa. 636, 574 A.2d 76 (1990) (Shiomos I) and Shiomos v. State Employes’ Retirement Board, 132 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 379, 572 A.2d 1311 (1990) {Shiomos II). For the reasons set forth in Shiomos I and Shiomos II, we affirm the order of the AOPC.

ORDER

AND NOW, April 2, 1990, the order of the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts in the above-captioned matter is affirmed.

CRUMLISH, Jr., President Judge, did not participate in the decision in this case. McGINLEY, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PALLADINO, Judge.

Thomas N. Shiomos (Shiomos) appeals from an order of the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts (AOPC) which terminated Shiomos’ medical insurance coverage as of January 5, 1989. Shiomos did not argue the merits of this case, admitting that this case is controlled by our opinions in Shiomos v. State Employes’ Retirement Board, 128 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 39, 562 A.2d 969 (1989) petition for allowance of appeal granted, 524 Pa. 636, 574 A.2d 76 (1990) (Shiomos I) and Shiomos v. State Employes’ Retirement Board, 132 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 379, 572 A.2d 1311 (1990) {Shiomos II). For the reasons set forth in Shiomos I and Shiomos II, we affirm the order of the AOPC.

ORDER

AND NOW, April 2, 1990, the order of the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts in the above-captioned matter is affirmed.

CRUMLISH, Jr., President Judge, did not participate in the decision in this case. McGINLEY, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

572 A.2d 1313, 132 Pa. Commw. 383, 1990 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shiomos-v-administrative-office-of-pennsylvania-courts-pacommwct-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack