Shiny Rock Mining Co. v. Ace Property & Casualty Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Shiny Rock Mining Co. v. Ace Property & Casualty Insurance

114 P.3d 538, 200 Or. App. 393, 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 781

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedJune 22, 2005

Docket00C-12656; A120827

StatusPublished

This text of 114 P.3d 538 (Shiny Rock Mining Co. v. Ace Property & Casualty Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shiny Rock Mining Co. v. Ace Property & Casualty Insurance, 114 P.3d 538, 200 Or. App. 393, 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 781 (Or. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In this action seeking insurance reimbursement for environmental remediation costs, plaintiff raises two assignments of error in its challenge of summary judgment for defendant insurer. We reject plaintiffs first assignment of error without discussion. Plaintiffs second assignment of error is resolved by Schnitzer Investment Corp. v. Certain Underwriters, 197 Or App 147, 104 P3d 1162 (2005).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

In this action seeking insurance reimbursement for environmental remediation costs, plaintiff raises two assignments of error in its challenge of summary judgment for defendant insurer. We reject plaintiffs first assignment of error without discussion. Plaintiffs second assignment of error is resolved by Schnitzer Investment Corp. v. Certain Underwriters, 197 Or App 147, 104 P3d 1162 (2005).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

114 P.3d 538, 200 Or. App. 393, 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 781, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shiny-rock-mining-co-v-ace-property-casualty-insurance-orctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack