Shiny Rock Mining Co. v. Ace Property & Casualty Insurance
114 P.3d 538, 200 Or. App. 393, 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 781
Opinion
In this action seeking insurance reimbursement for environmental remediation costs, plaintiff raises two assignments of error in its challenge of summary judgment for defendant insurer. We reject plaintiffs first assignment of error without discussion. Plaintiffs second assignment of error is resolved by Schnitzer Investment Corp. v. Certain Underwriters, 197 Or App 147, 104 P3d 1162 (2005).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shiny Rock Mining Co. v. Ace Property & Casualty Insurance, 114 P.3d 538, 200 Or. App. 393, 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 781 (Or. Ct. App. 2005).
114 P.3d 538 (Shiny Rock Mining Co. v. Ace Property & Casualty Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Schnitzer Investment Corp. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London
104 P.3d 1162 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2005)