ShinStar LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule “A”

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided June 29, 2026·No. 1:26-cv-05321·Unknown

Opinion

= MICU ENDURO USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT □□ ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK [J DOC #:___ DATE FILED: 6/29/2026 SHINSTAR LLC, Case No. 26-cv-05321 Plaintiff, v. THE PARTNERSHIPS and UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE “A”, Defendants.

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL Plaintiff ShinStar LLC (“Plaintiff or “Sprunki’) files this Motion requesting leave to file the following documents under seal: (1) Schedule A attached to the Complaint, which includes a list of the fully interactive, e-commerce stores operating under the seller aliases (the “Seller Aliases”) and the e-commerce store URLs under the Online Marketplaces; (2) Exhibit 3 to the Complaint, which includes screenshot printouts showing the e-commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases; (3) Exhibit 3 to the Declaration of Zhen Liang, which includes screenshot printouts showing the e-commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases and (4) Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Berel Y. Lakovitsky, which includes screenshot printouts identifying the Seller Aliases. In this action, Plaintiff is requesting temporary ex parte relief based on an action for trademark infringement, counterfeiting, false designation of origin, and copyright infringement. Temporarily sealing these portions of the file is necessary to preserve the status quo and prevent the Defendants from learning of these proceedings prior to the execution of the temporary restraining order. See Nike, Inc. v. P'ships, et al., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 223452, at *10 n.* (E.D.

Mo. Nov. 13, 2025) (“Maintaining these documents under seal at this time will help preserve the status quo and will preserve the Court's ability to grant relief in this matter.”). If Defendants were to learn of these proceedings prematurely, the likely result would be the destruction of relevant documentary evidence and the hiding or transferring of assets to foreign jurisdictions, which would frustrate the purpose of the underlying law, interfere with this Court’s

power to grant relief, and “render fruitless further prosecution of the action.” In re Vuitton Et Fils S.A., 606 F.2d 1, 5 (2d Cir. 1979); see also Louis Vuitton v. White, 945 F.2d 569, 571 (3d Cir. 1991) (recognizing that “upon being apprised of the institution of a lawsuit by the trademark owner, [a counterfeiter] will conceal his infringing merchandise and either destroy or conceal all records relating to this merchandise, thereby frustrating implementation of the trademark owner’s statutory and common law rights.”); Viral DRM, LLC v. Unknown Counter Notificants, 688 F. Supp. 3d 1271, 1279 (N.D. Ga. 2023) (sealing certain documents due to the plaintiff’s “legitimate concern that when Defendants learn of its claims and requested relief, they may hide or transfer any ill-gotten proceeds and relevant records, hindering the prospects of a future remedy.”).

Once the temporary restraining order has been served on the relevant parties and the requested actions are taken, Plaintiff will move to unseal these documents. Plaintiff’s requested relief is also similar to relief entered by other courts in this District under similar factual circumstances. See, e.g., Fender Musical Instruments Corporation v. The Individuals, et al., No. 1:26-cv-00788-AS (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 30, 2026), ECF No. 17 (granting motion for leave to file under seal); Kaws, Inc., et al v. The Individuals, et al., No. 1:26-cv-03010-DLC (S.D.N.Y. April 17, 2026), ECF No. 22 (same); Roblox Corporation v. The Individuals, et al., No. 1:26-cv-04128-JPO (S.D.N.Y. May 19, 2026), ECF No. 15 (same). For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court grant this Motion. Dated this 24th day of June 2026. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Berel Y. Lakovitsky Berel Y. Lakovitsky N.Y. Bar No. 6224323 Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd. 90 Broad Street 2nd Floor New York, NY 10004 312.374.8676 / 312.360.9315 (facsimile) blakovitsky@gbc.law Counsel for Plaintiff ShinStar LLC

Application GRANTED. SO ORDERED.

6/29/2026 HON. VALERIE CAPRONI UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ShinStar LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule “A”, (S.D.N.Y. 2026).

ShinStar LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule “A” (ShinStar LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule “A”) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related