Shinn v. Spohn

Supreme Court of Kansas

Shinn v. Spohn

72 P. 1101, 66 Kan. 812, 1903 Kan. LEXIS 193

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedApril 11, 1903

DocketNo. 13,082

StatusPublished

This text of 72 P. 1101 (Shinn v. Spohn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shinn v. Spohn, 72 P. 1101, 66 Kan. 812, 1903 Kan. LEXIS 193 (kan 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

We have examined the record on the several points of error assigned, and conclude that the case was tried fairly. No error appears affecting the substantial rights of the defendant below. The instructions respecting the right to recover exemplary damages were in accordance with the decisions of this court. The evidence of good faith on the part of Shinn was properly held to go in mitigation-of punitive damages only. ( Garnier v. Squires, 62 Kan. 321, 62 Pac. 1005.)

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

We have examined the record on the several points of error assigned, and conclude that the case was tried fairly. No error appears affecting the substantial rights of the defendant below. The instructions respecting the right to recover exemplary damages were in accordance with the decisions of this court. The evidence of good faith on the part of Shinn was properly held to go in mitigation-of punitive damages only. ( Garnier v. Squires, 62 Kan. 321, 62 Pac. 1005.)

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

72 P. 1101, 66 Kan. 812, 1903 Kan. LEXIS 193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shinn-v-spohn-kan-1903.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack