Shinn v. Cotton

52 Ark. 90
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedMay 15, 1889
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 52 Ark. 90 (Shinn v. Cotton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shinn v. Cotton, 52 Ark. 90 (Ark. 1889).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Ferries: Running without license. This is a suit for a statutory penalty under Sec. 3335 Mansfield’s Digest. The proof showed the running of a free skiff within a mile of plaintiff’s licensed ferry, by the defendants, as an inducement to persons to trade at their store.

The agreed statement of facts is to the effect that the persons so carried did not agree to buy anything of defendants, and that the defendants made no charge, in money or other valuable thing, for ferriage.

Plaintiff’s right to damages for an injury done him, had he sought such a remedy, would have been clear under the authorities cited by him; but the statutory penalty is not recoverable against one who runs a free ferry. The agreed statement of facts excludes a recovery.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crane v. Jackson
188 S.W. 1188 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 Ark. 90, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shinn-v-cotton-ark-1889.