Shinkewitz v. Shinkewitz

306 So. 2d 537
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 14, 1975
DocketNo. 73-1503
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 306 So. 2d 537 (Shinkewitz v. Shinkewitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shinkewitz v. Shinkewitz, 306 So. 2d 537 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the petitioner-husband from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage in which the trial court partitioned the marital residence, granted attorney’s fees to the wife’s counsel and set a supersedeas bond.

Appellant has raised four points on appeal challenging these various actions taken by the trial judge.

We have carefully considered each point in light of the record on appeal, the briefs, and arguments of counsel, and' have determined that no reversible error has been demonstrated.

The record shows that the marriage between the parties, each in their seventies, was of short duration (about four months). In our view, the court did not abuse its discretion in resolving the property rights of the couple or in setting a reasonable attorney’s fee.

Therefore, the judgment appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Saltzman v. Ahern
306 So. 2d 537 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
306 So. 2d 537, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shinkewitz-v-shinkewitz-fladistctapp-1975.