Shinkai v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Shinkai v. United States

6 Cust. Ct. 932, 1941 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1254

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedApril 28, 1941

DocketNo. 5239; Entry No. 5458, etc.

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Cust. Ct. 932 (Shinkai v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shinkai v. United States, 6 Cust. Ct. 932, 1941 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1254 (cusc 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Tilson, Judge:

The appeals listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon a stipulation to the effect that certain items of the merchandise are the same in character and description as the merchandise in United States v. Nippon Dry Goods Co., Reap. Dec. 5006; that the appraised value, less any amounts added by the importers by reason of the so-called Japanese consumption tax, represents the proper export value, and that there was do higher foreign value.

On the agreed facts I find and hold the proper dutiable export value of the rayon wearing apparel and the rayon footwear covered by said appeals to be the value found by the appraiser, less any amount added by the importers by reason of the so-called Japanese consumption tax. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tilson, Judge:

The appeals listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon a stipulation to the effect that certain items of the merchandise are the same in character and description as the merchandise in United States v. Nippon Dry Goods Co., Reap. Dec. 5006; that the appraised value, less any amounts added by the importers by reason of the so-called Japanese consumption tax, represents the proper export value, and that there was do higher foreign value.

On the agreed facts I find and hold the proper dutiable export value of the rayon wearing apparel and the rayon footwear covered by said appeals to be the value found by the appraiser, less any amount added by the importers by reason of the so-called Japanese consumption tax. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Cust. Ct. 932, 1941 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shinkai-v-united-states-cusc-1941.