Shinka v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Shinka v. State

807 So. 2d 764, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1676, 2002 WL 226176

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 15, 2002

DocketNo. 2D01-5195

StatusPublished

This text of 807 So. 2d 764 (Shinka v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shinka v. State, 807 So. 2d 764, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1676, 2002 WL 226176 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

CASANUEVA, Judge.

Jeffrey L. Shinka appeals the summary denial of his motion for jail time credit filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Shinka alleged that he has not received the credit to which he was entitled. The trial court denied the claim, noting that Shinka failed to provide any details as to what credit was being denied him. We affirm the trial court’s order because Shinka’s motion is facially insufficient. See State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla.1998); Flanagan v. State, 792 So.2d 519 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). Our affirmance is without prejudice to Shinka’s right to file a facially sufficient motion.

Affirmed.

DAVIS and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CASANUEVA, Judge.

Jeffrey L. Shinka appeals the summary denial of his motion for jail time credit filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Shinka alleged that he has not received the credit to which he was entitled. The trial court denied the claim, noting that Shinka failed to provide any details as to what credit was being denied him. We affirm the trial court’s order because Shinka’s motion is facially insufficient. See State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla.1998); Flanagan v. State, 792 So.2d 519 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). Our affirmance is without prejudice to Shinka’s right to file a facially sufficient motion.

Affirmed.

DAVIS and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

807 So. 2d 764, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1676, 2002 WL 226176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shinka-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack