Shingle Springs Band v. Caballero

424 F. App'x 696
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 28, 2011·No. No. 10-17329·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Cesar Caballero appeals the district court’s grant of a request for preliminary injunctive relief against him. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.

Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in granting preliminary injunctive relief. The Lands Council v. McNair, 537 F.3d 981, 986 (9th Cir.2008); see Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 555 U.S. 7, 129 S.Ct. 365, 374, 172 L.Ed.2d 249 (2008) (listing factors for district court to consider); Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press Intern., Inc., 686 F.2d 750, 752-53 (9th Cir.1982) (explaining limited scope of review). We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order granting the preliminary injunction.

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shingle Springs Band v. Caballero, 424 F. App'x 696 (9th Cir. 2011).

424 F. App'x 696 (Shingle Springs Band v. Caballero) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related