Shingel v. Peters

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Shingel v. Peters

867 So. 2d 1281, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3850, 2004 WL 587680

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 26, 2004

DocketNo. 5D03-1865

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 867 So. 2d 1281 (Shingel v. Peters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shingel v. Peters, 867 So. 2d 1281, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3850, 2004 WL 587680 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants challenge the lower court’s order that enforced an Illinois court’s judgment under which Appellees, the maternal grandmother and maternal great-grandmother of two children, were given rights of visitation with the children, who now reside in this state with their mother and father. Appellants acknowledge that our decision today is controlled by our prior decision in Bellow v. Bellow, 736 So.2d 759 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999), but urge that we recede from Bellow in light of the Fourth District’s decision in M.S. v. D.C., 763 So.2d 1051 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). We decline Appellant’s request that we recede from Bellow but certify conflict with M.S. v. D.C.

AFFIRMED; CONFLICT CERTIFIED.

SAWAYA, C.J., SHARP, W., and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellants challenge the lower court’s order that enforced an Illinois court’s judgment under which Appellees, the maternal grandmother and maternal great-grandmother of two children, were given rights of visitation with the children, who now reside in this state with their mother and father. Appellants acknowledge that our decision today is controlled by our prior decision in Bellow v. Bellow, 736 So.2d 759 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999), but urge that we recede from Bellow in light of the Fourth District’s decision in M.S. v. D.C., 763 So.2d 1051 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). We decline Appellant’s request that we recede from Bellow but certify conflict with M.S. v. D.C.

AFFIRMED; CONFLICT CERTIFIED.

SAWAYA, C.J., SHARP, W., and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

867 So. 2d 1281, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3850, 2004 WL 587680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shingel-v-peters-fladistctapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack