Shing v. Wal Mart Corp.

Fourth Circuit

Shing v. Wal Mart Corp.

667 F. App'x 423

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 1, 2016·No. No. 16-1563·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Doreen Shing appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint alleging vi[424] olations of the Americans with Disabilities Act for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Shing v. Wal Mart Corp., No. 1:16-cv-00322-CCB (D. Md. May 6, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Doreen Shing appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint alleging vi[424] olations of the Americans with Disabilities Act for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Shing v. Wal Mart Corp., No. 1:16-cv-00322-CCB (D. Md. May 6, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Shing v. Wal Mart Corp., 667 F. App'x 423 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

667 F. App'x 423 (Shing v. Wal Mart Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.