Shinault v. Creed

92 S.E.2d 787, 244 N.C. 217, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 674
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided May 23, 1956·No. 675·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

No negligence is presumed from the mere fact that plaintiff’s intestate was run over, and killed by the defendant. The evidence, when considered in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, and giving to him the benefit of every reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom, fails to disclose any negligence on defendant’s part, and, in particular, fails to show that the defendant by the exercise of reasonable care could have discovered the perilous plight of the deceased and his incapacity to escape therefrom before he ran over him.

Thé judgment of nonsuit below is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shinault v. Creed, 92 S.E.2d 787, 244 N.C. 217, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 674 (N.C. 1956).

92 S.E.2d 787 (Shinault v. Creed) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Battle v. Chavis
147 S.E.2d 387 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1966)
Barnes v. Horney
101 S.E.2d 315 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1958)
Cagle v. Norfolk Southern Railway
144 F. Supp. 710 (M.D. North Carolina, 1956)