Shinall Bros. v. Cartersville Electric Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Shinall Bros. v. Cartersville Electric Co.

112 S.E. 163, 28 Ga. App. 526, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 656

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 6, 1922

Docket13027

StatusPublished

This text of 112 S.E. 163 (Shinall Bros. v. Cartersville Electric Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shinall Bros. v. Cartersville Electric Co., 112 S.E. 163, 28 Ga. App. 526, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 656 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, J.

The motion for a new trial contains, besides the usual general grounds, seven special assignments of error as to extracts from the charge of the court. Each one of these grounds has been examined in connection with the entire charge and the evidence, and no error is discovered. The instructions as a whole correctly presented to the jury the issues involved. The verdict is fully supported by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, J.

The motion for a new trial contains, besides the usual general grounds, seven special assignments of error as to extracts from the charge of the court. Each one of these grounds has been examined in connection with the entire charge and the evidence, and no error is discovered. The instructions as a whole correctly presented to the jury the issues involved. The verdict is fully supported by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 S.E. 163, 28 Ga. App. 526, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 656, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shinall-bros-v-cartersville-electric-co-gactapp-1922.