Shimola v. City of Cleveland

623 N.E.2d 84, 68 Ohio St. 3d 1201
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 22, 1993·No. No. 92-1718·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., Wright and M.L. Resnick, JJ., dissent. Melvin L. Resnick, J., of the Sixth Appellate District, sitting for F.E. Sweeney, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shimola v. City of Cleveland, 623 N.E.2d 84, 68 Ohio St. 3d 1201 (Ohio 1993).

623 N.E.2d 84 (Shimola v. City of Cleveland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Shimola v. Cleveland
1994 Ohio 243 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)