Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Shimola v. City of Cleveland

Shimola v. City of Cleveland

623 N.E.2d 84, 68 Ohio St. 3d 1201
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 22, 1993
DocketNo. 92-1718
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 623 N.E.2d 84 (Shimola v. City of Cleveland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shimola v. City of Cleveland, 623 N.E.2d 84, 68 Ohio St. 3d 1201 (Ohio 1993).

Opinions

The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., Wright and M.L. Resnick, JJ., dissent. Melvin L. Resnick, J., of the Sixth Appellate District, sitting for F.E. Sweeney, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Shimola v. Cleveland
1994 Ohio 243 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
623 N.E.2d 84, 68 Ohio St. 3d 1201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shimola-v-city-of-cleveland-ohio-1993.