Shimizu v. Cataldo
This text of Shimizu v. Cataldo (Shimizu v. Cataldo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 25-AUG-2025 02:15 PM Dkt. 41 ODDP
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI ________________________________________________________________
RIKA SHIMIZU, Petitioner,
vs.
THE HONORABLE LISA W. CATALDO, Judge of the Circuit Court of the First Circuit, State of Hawaiʻi, Respondent Judge,
and
R.T., a minor; TOMOKO MATSUKAWA; MINA TAKAMURA; TAKESHI NANBU, Respondents. ________________________________________________________________
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CASE NO. 1CCV-XX-XXXXXXX)
ORDER DENYING PETITION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, and Ginoza, JJ., and Circuit Judge Copeland, in place of Devens, J., recused)
Upon consideration of the petition for writ of mandamus or
extraordinary writ filed February 11, 2025, 1 and the record,
1 The petition for extraordinary writ filed at docket 1 is much too long because it totals 136 pages, exclusive of the cover page, case caption on the first page of the petition, and the single page displaying the envelope used to mail the petition to this court. Docket 1 does not contain any exhibits or appendices. Petitioner has not demonstrated a clear and indisputable right
to relief, nor a lack of alternative means to obtain the relief
sought. See Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP v. Kim, 153 Hawaiʻi
307, 319, 537 P.3d 1154, 1166 (2023); see also Hawaiʻi Revised
Statutes § 641-1(a) (2016).
It is ordered that the petition is denied.
It is further ordered that the motion to proceed in forma
pauperis is dismissed, the motion for stay is denied as moot,
and all other pending motions are denied.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, August 25, 2025.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza
/s/ Rebecca A. Copeland
The page limit for a petition for extraordinary writ is 35 pages, exclusive of any cover page, appendices, and exhibits. See Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rules 28(a), 28(f); see also HRAP Rules 1(d), 16, 17; Hawaiʻi Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 8(a). Unless leave is granted to exceed the page limitation, Petitioner is instructed to comply with the 35- page limit in any future petitions for extraordinary writ that are filed with this court. See HRAP Rule 1(d) (“Attorneys and pro se parties are deemed to be aware of, and are expected to comply with, all of the provisions of these rules.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Shimizu v. Cataldo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shimizu-v-cataldo-haw-2025.