Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Shimek v. State

Shimek v. State

658 So. 2d 675, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8481, 1995 WL 469659
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 10, 1995
DocketNo. 94-1692
StatusPublished

This text of 658 So. 2d 675 (Shimek v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shimek v. State, 658 So. 2d 675, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8481, 1995 WL 469659 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order denying appellant’s Motion to Correct Record and Sentence because the motion was legally insufficient on its face. Wyche v. State, 624 So.2d 830 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).

BOOTH, LAWRENCE and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wyche v. State
624 So. 2d 830 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
658 So. 2d 675, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8481, 1995 WL 469659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shimek-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.