Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Shimek v. State

Shimek v. State

658 So. 2d 675, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8481, 1995 WL 469659
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Shimek v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 610 So. 2d 632 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 10, 1995·No. No. 94-1692·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order denying appellant’s Motion to Correct Record and Sentence because the motion was legally insufficient on its face. Wyche v. State, 624 So.2d 830 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).

BOOTH, LAWRENCE and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shimek v. State, 658 So. 2d 675, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8481, 1995 WL 469659 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

658 So. 2d 675 (Shimek v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wyche v. State
624 So. 2d 830 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)