Shimamoto v. S&F Warehouses, Inc.
724 N.E.2d 763, 94 N.Y.2d 837, 703 N.Y.S.2d 68, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 3877
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Shimamoto v. S&F Warehouses, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 99 N.Y.2d 165 →
Opinion
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal with respect to Simon, Meyrowitz, Meyrowitz & Schlussel, S&F Warehouses, Inc. and S&J Trucking Co., Inc., dismissed upon the ground that as to those parties the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal with respect to Eugene Friedman and Avi Fishof denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shimamoto v. S&F Warehouses, Inc., 724 N.E.2d 763, 94 N.Y.2d 837, 703 N.Y.S.2d 68, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 3877 (N.Y. 1999).
724 N.E.2d 763 (Shimamoto v. S&F Warehouses, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.