Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Shillingford v. Eckert

Shillingford v. Eckert

73 A.D.2d 601, 422 N.Y.S.2d 121, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14387
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 3, 1979
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 73 A.D.2d 601 (Shillingford v. Eckert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shillingford v. Eckert, 73 A.D.2d 601, 422 N.Y.S.2d 121, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14387 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 18,1979, which granted plaintiffs’ motion for leave to serve and file an amended bill of particulars. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The amended bill of particulars does not seek to set forth new injuries, but merely expands upon "continuing * * * disabilities” alleged in the original bill of particulars. Thus, plaintiffs had a right to serve this amended bill of particulars (see CPLR 3043, subd [b]; L 1979, ch 590). Mollen, P. J., Titone, O’Connor, Cohalan and Margett, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cardone v. University Hospital
78 A.D.2d 645 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 A.D.2d 601, 422 N.Y.S.2d 121, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shillingford-v-eckert-nyappdiv-1979.