Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Shillingburg v. Turtle Creek Assets, Ltd.

Shillingburg v. Turtle Creek Assets, Ltd.

126 N.E.3d 1182, 2019 Ohio 2953, 156 Ohio St. 3d 1469
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 24, 2019
Docket2019-0766
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 126 N.E.3d 1182 (Shillingburg v. Turtle Creek Assets, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shillingburg v. Turtle Creek Assets, Ltd., 126 N.E.3d 1182, 2019 Ohio 2953, 156 Ohio St. 3d 1469 (Ohio 2019).

Opinion

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULING

On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the question stated at page 4 of the court of appeals' journal entry filed June 5, 2019: "Does R.C. 2711.03 require a trial court to hold an oral hearing on a motion to compel arbitration?"

The conflict cases are Chrysler Fin. Servs. v. Henderson, 4th Dist. Athens No. 11CA4, 2011-Ohio-6813, and Mattox v. Dillard's Inc., 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 90991, 2008-Ohio-6488.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Snyder v. Old World Classics, L.L.C.
2023 Ohio 4019 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 N.E.3d 1182, 2019 Ohio 2953, 156 Ohio St. 3d 1469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shillingburg-v-turtle-creek-assets-ltd-ohio-2019.