Shillingburg v. Turtle Creek Assets, Ltd.

Ohio Supreme Court

Shillingburg v. Turtle Creek Assets, Ltd.

126 N.E.3d 1182, 2019 Ohio 2953, 156 Ohio St. 3d 1469

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 24, 2019·No. 2019-0766·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULING

On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the question stated at page 4 of the court of appeals' journal entry filed June 5, 2019: "Does R.C. 2711.03 require a trial court to hold an oral hearing on a motion to compel arbitration?"

The conflict cases are Chrysler Fin. Servs. v. Henderson, 4th Dist. Athens No. 11CA4, 2011-Ohio-6813, and Mattox v. Dillard's Inc., 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 90991, 2008-Ohio-6488.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULING

On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the question stated at page 4 of the court of appeals' journal entry filed June 5, 2019: "Does R.C. 2711.03 require a trial court to hold an oral hearing on a motion to compel arbitration?"

The conflict cases are Chrysler Fin. Servs. v. Henderson, 4th Dist. Athens No. 11CA4, 2011-Ohio-6813, and Mattox v. Dillard's Inc., 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 90991, 2008-Ohio-6488.

Shillingburg v. Turtle Creek Assets, Ltd., 126 N.E.3d 1182, 2019 Ohio 2953, 156 Ohio St. 3d 1469 (Ohio 2019).

Pincite

126 N.E.3d 1182 (Shillingburg v. Turtle Creek Assets, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related