Shilito v. Thacker

43 Ohio St. (N.S.) 63
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1885·Published

Opinion

By the Court.

A paper purporting to be a bill of exceptions, but which is not signed as required by statute, will not be considered as a part of the record, although the journal entry in the case recites that a bill of exceptions was duly signed, sealed, allowed and ordered to be made part of the record, and no other paper purporting to be a bill of exceptions appears in the files of the ease. Rankin v. Sanderson, 35 Ohio St. 482, approved and followed.

Judgment of the district court reversed and that of the common pleas affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shilito v. Thacker, 43 Ohio St. (N.S.) 63 (Ohio 1885).

43 Ohio St. (N.S.) 63 (Shilito v. Thacker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.