Shigemura v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Shigemura v. State

800 S.W.2d 772, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 1659, 1990 WL 175727

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 13, 1990

DocketNo. 58029

StatusPublished

This text of 800 S.W.2d 772 (Shigemura v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shigemura v. State, 800 S.W.2d 772, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 1659, 1990 WL 175727 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Facts regarding mov-ant’s trial and sentencing are found in State v. Shigemura, 768 S.W.2d 620 (Mo.App.1989). (Conviction affirmed on March 28, 1989). On November 22, 1989, movant filed a pro se motion. The motion was untimely because it was filed more than thirty days after movant filed the transcript in his direct appeal. Rule 29.15(b). Movant’s motion is time barred by the provisions of the rule. See Day v. State, 770 S.W.2d 692, 695 (Mo. banc 1989), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 186, 107 L.Ed.2d 141 (1989).

We affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Facts regarding mov-ant’s trial and sentencing are found in State v. Shigemura, 768 S.W.2d 620 (Mo.App.1989). (Conviction affirmed on March 28, 1989). On November 22, 1989, movant filed a pro se motion. The motion was untimely because it was filed more than thirty days after movant filed the transcript in his direct appeal. Rule 29.15(b). Movant’s motion is time barred by the provisions of the rule. See Day v. State, 770 S.W.2d 692, 695 (Mo. banc 1989), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 186, 107 L.Ed.2d 141 (1989).

We affirm.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

800 S.W.2d 772, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 1659, 1990 WL 175727, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shigemura-v-state-moctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack