Shifman v. Whalen

200 A.D. 878

This text of 200 A.D. 878 (Shifman v. Whalen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shifman v. Whalen, 200 A.D. 878 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Mr. Justice Young in Thomson v. Gasteiger [199 App. Div. 744], decided herewith. Present — Blackmar, P. J., Rich, Kelly, Jaycox and Manning, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thomson v. Gasteiger
199 A.D. 744 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
200 A.D. 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shifman-v-whalen-nyappdiv-1922.